On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:27:28PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the > > IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device > > registration time being that which is passed directly through the board > > info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number. > > I don't see issues with this approach. Cc'd Jarkko and Andy just in case > I missed something. I failed to see the i2c_acpi_get_irq() in the current code. What kernel version do you use? Can we see the changes against vanilla / i2c-next? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
