Hi Wolfram, On 16/05/2019 22:13, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Even though we don't use it yet, we should mark the second I2C address > this device is listening to as used. > > Not yet for upstream until all dependencies are merged! > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> As I reviewed the other two anyway, it seems silly not to add this here :D Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c > index 455de74c0dd2..2133b09f6e7a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c > @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static int da9063_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, > return ret; > } > > + devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&i2c->dev, i2c->adapter, i2c->addr + 1); > + > return da9063_device_init(da9063, i2c->irq); > } > >
