Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: make DMA more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: make DMA more robust
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:39:57 +0100
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux I2C <linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdXx2zKaV1mEBh+br5=BPbCSi3HVa_dpjpz1ippSS_oN9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190305175434.13107-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMuHMdXx2zKaV1mEBh+br5=BPbCSi3HVa_dpjpz1ippSS_oN9A@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

> > Tested on a Renesas Salvator XS (R-Car M3N) and now regressions found when
> 
> no regressions? ;-)

:DDD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: make DMA more robust
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: make DMA more robust
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: rcar: sanity check for minimal DMA length
Next by Date: [PATCH] i2c: Do _not_ clear client->irq on remove if the irq comes from the board_info
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: make DMA more robust
Next by thread: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 5.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux