On 26/02/2019 13:16, Wolfram Sang wrote:
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i2c-devices-pca954x | 20 +++++
Should not ABI/... patches go to someone? Who? Did you use
get_maintainer.pl? I think you should at least include the main kernel
list? Maybe someone filters messages looking for ABI changes?
CCing Greg is a good idea here. The hunk doesn't really to go via his
tree AFAIK but an ack from him might be good.
Ok, will do.
+What: /sys/bus/i2c/.../idle_state
+Date: January 2019
+KernelVersion: 5.2
+Contact: Robert Shearman <robert.shearman@xxxxxxx>
+Description:
+ Value that can be written to control the behaviour of
+ the multiplexer on idle. Possible values:
+ -2 - disconnect on idle, i.e. deselect the last used
+ channel, which is useful when there is a device
+ with an address that conflicts with another
+ device on another pca954x mux on the same parent
Nit: It doesn't need to be a PCA954x mux, it could be any mux.
And maybe say that it only exists for mux devices?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but does the filename of
sysfs-bus-i2c-devices-pca954x not already convey that information?
Thanks,
Rob
