On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 11:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:27 PM Mathieu Poirier
> <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Silesh,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 03:47:24PM +0530, Silesh C V wrote:
> > > Some drivers need to find the device on a bus having a specific firmware
> > > node. Currently, such drivers have their own implementations to do this.
> > > Provide a helper similar to bus_find_device_by_name so that each driver
> > > does not have to reinvent this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Silesh C V <svellattu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > - make use of dev_fwnode in match_fwnode.
> > >
> > > drivers/base/bus.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/device.h | 3 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> > > index 8bfd27e..a2f39db 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/string.h>
> > > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > > #include "base.h"
> > > #include "power/power.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -373,6 +374,25 @@ struct device *bus_find_device_by_name(struct bus_type *bus,
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bus_find_device_by_name);
> > >
> > > +static int match_fwnode(struct device *dev, void *fwnode)
> > > +{
> > > + return dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * bus_find_device_by_fwnode - device iterator for locating a particular device
> > > + * having a specific firmware node
> > > + * @bus: bus type
> > > + * @start: Device to begin with
> > > + * @fwnode: firmware node of the device to match
> > > + */
> > > +struct device *bus_find_device_by_fwnode(struct bus_type *bus, struct device *start,
> > > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> >
> > I get the following when running checkpatch on your set:
> >
> > mpoirier@xps15:~/work/linaro/coresight/kernel-maint$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > 0001-Driver-core-add-bus_find_device_by_fwnode.patch
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
>
> Lines longer than 80 chars often are legitimate. No need to send
> extra reports about those cases in general.
In this case I don't see a reason not to abide to the guideline.
Wrapping the function declaration to 80 characters would be easy
without effecting code readability.
Mathieu
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
