On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Feel free to ignore if this is a topic already discussed in other > > threads. To be honest, I did not search the mailing list to determine if > > this particular issue was already discussed. > > Not this particular issue, but in general we usually don't change > working code to silence false positives in code checkers. Ok. > But thanks for letting me know this is a false positive! No worries. Thanks for having a look. > BTW next time CC Dan Carpenter, he might be interested to fix the issue > in smatch. I'll try to remember this in the future. Thanks again! -- Regards, George
