Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 18:02:18 +0200
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4166793.YvRDWkLZ4a@aspire.rjw.lan>
References: <20180923135812.29574-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <4166793.YvRDWkLZ4a@aspire.rjw.lan>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

> Patches [0-6/7] have been applied.
> 
> I guess the [7/7] can go in via the I2C tree if everyone involved agrees.

I agree, but it doesn't apply, neither on i2c/for-4.20 nor i2c/for-next.

Hans, do you have time to check?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
  - From: Hans de Goede

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
  - From: Hans de Goede
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/12] i2c: omap: use core to detect 'no zero length' quirk
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/12] i2c: omap: use core to detect 'no zero length' quirk
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Resume BYT/CHT LPSS I2C controller before the iGPU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]