On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:23:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:20:39AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:25:53PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:39:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Instead of using custom variables and parser, convert the driver to use > > > > the ones provided by I2C core. > > > > > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Hmm, this patch is also not in patchwork :( > > > > > > However, Ludovic: I'd think it makes sense to postpone this patch until > > > after the master/slave refactoring? I'd think it is easier to rebase > > > this patch than to rebase the refactoring? > > > > > > Or what do you think? > > > > > > > It depends on what is planed for the master/slave support. As I told, at > > the moment, I can't handle testing more the slave support. Even if it's > > not perfect, it seems to work in a basic situation. > > > > So I would say, if you plan to take it, yes we can postpone this patch. > > If not, apply it and I will rebase the slave support later even if it > > will be a bit more difficult in this way. > > So, shall I resend it? Seems the question remains. Ludovic, are you going to take it with your stuff together or we are waiting for Wolfram? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
