Hi, On 31-08-18 12:01, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Yes that is fine, given that that is a bugfix for a regression introduced in 4.18 it is actually a good thing that you've already applied patch 1/2. I assume you've added this to a fixes branch?Yes, for-current means fixes :) This patch here doesn't seem urgent, so it would be more for-next material?
Yes this patch is more for-next material. Regards, Hans
