On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Jun Gao correctly identified a problem when freeing a DMA safe buffer [1], many > thanks for that! However, I'd like to not introduce yet another function. So, I > thought about changing the existing API to support the case of freeing a buffer > in case no sync back to the message is needed. Here is what I came up with and > I like the new way better. > > Once this is set in place, the only existing user so far, has been fixed. It > was leaking the bounce buffer on error cases before. Tested on a Renesas Lager > board (R-Car H2). > > Please let me know your thoughts. Jun Gao, does it work for you as well? > > If all goes well, I would like to apply it for -rc2. But I am still open for > comments, of course. > > Thanks and happy hacking, > > Wolfram Applied all to for-current.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
