On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:03 PM Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2018-08-28 03:52, Rob Herring wrote: > > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, > > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. > > > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c | 15 ++++++++------- > > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpmux.c | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > > index f2a2067525ef..b706fd136ca5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > > @@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ static int i2c_powermac_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > struct pmac_i2c_bus *bus = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev); > > struct device_node *parent = NULL; > > Lose the initializer... That's pretty much unrelated though. I'd have to write "Also, remove the unnecessary parent pointer init" in the commit message and we all know "Also" is a clue for belongs in a separate patch. Rob
