Hi Vitor,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:43:34 +0100
vitor <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> On 19-07-2018 16:29, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > +int i3c_bus_register(struct i3c_bus *i3cbus)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_dev_desc *desc;
> > +
> > + i3c_bus_for_each_i2cdev(i3cbus, desc) {
> > + switch (desc->boardinfo->lvr & I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX_MASK) {
> > + case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(0):
> > + if (i3cbus->mode < I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_FAST)
> > + i3cbus->mode = I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_FAST;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(1):
> > + case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(2):
> > + if (i3cbus->mode < I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW)
> > + i3cbus->mode = I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c)
> > + i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = I3C_BUS_TYP_I3C_SCL_RATE;
> > +
> > + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c) {
> > + if (i3cbus->mode == I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW)
> > + i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_SCL_RATE;
> > + else
> > + i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * I3C/I2C frequency may have been overridden, check that user-provided
> > + * values are not exceeding max possible frequency.
> > + */
> > + if (i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c > I3C_BUS_MAX_I3C_SCL_RATE ||
> > + i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c > I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE) {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_set_name(&i3cbus->dev, "i3c-%d", i3cbus->id);
> > +
> > + return device_add(&i3cbus->dev);
> > +}
> During the tests of the bus with i2c devices I found the i2c_dev_desc
> objects aren't allocated before this function. This cause i3cbus->mode =
> I3C_BUS_MODE_PURE.
I just checked and DT parsing (+ I2C descs creation) is done before
i3c_bus_register() is called, so we should be good. How did you declare
your I2C devices (right now, only DT declaration is supported).
>
> I want to do something for the slave and secondary master, do you
> already have infrastructure that you can share?
What do you mean?
Regards,
Boris
