On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:39:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Replace short statement in comment with proper SPDX license tag. > > Note, for i2c-desingware-slave.c the identifier is chosen > in accordance with MODULE_LICENSE() macro since it is visible to user. > Another point to this choice is that the header seems to be copy'n'paste > from the other file of this very driver. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> checkpatch warning: WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #76: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h:1: +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ Header files use C-style comments. Also, I think "-or-later" is the new trend instead of "+".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
