On Monday 23 July 2018 11:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 05:20:17PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: >> If CLKH is set to 0 I2C clock is not generated at all, so avoid this value >> and stretch the clock in this case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Applied to for-current, thanks! > > I did not add stable because Alexander told me this is very likely not > to be observed on HW out there. But TI people are investigating more. > I suggest they resend this patch to stable if they see fit. D'accord > everyone? Sounds good to me. Thanks, Sekhar