Hi Wolfram, Am Dienstag, den 03.04.2018, 15:29 +0200 schrieb Wolfram Sang: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:25:18PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > This is unsafe, as the runtime PM callbacks are called from the PM > > workqueue, so this may deadlock when handling an i2c attached > > clock, > > which may already hold the clk_prepare mutex from another context. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Applied to for-next, thanks! > > stable tag? Yes, even though the number of affected systems is low it might make sense: Fixes: 588eb93ea49f (i2c: imx: add runtime pm support to improve the performance) Regards, Lucas
