On 2018-03-19 17:10, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Commit dde67eb1beeb ("i2c: add i2c_get_device_id() to get the standard > I2C device id") added a function to return the standard I2C device ID. > Use that function to verify the device ID of a given device. Yeah, you're moving complexity from the driver to the core, reducing the indentation level and generally make things look neater. In fact, I thought about adding something like this, but didn't since I only had the one user. The only negative is the added line count, but I suppose more drivers will call this function down the line so it should be a net win in the long run. There was the PCA9641 chip earlier today e.g., but maybe we should wait for more device id users? I wonder when other manufacturers will get on board? I also wonder if NXP will ever release a chip with part-id 0 and die-revision 0? If not, an all zero struct i2c_device_identity could be used instead of manufacturer_id 0xffff and that would simplify the pca954x driver code a bit more. But I guess we can never know the answer to that question. And even if we did, the answer might change later. But it would be nice... > Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > RFC: > - Compile tested only Can't test either since I have no chips, but the code looks good. Adrian have HW, but maybe he's getting tried of testing? Hmmm, for testing purposes it would be nice if a linux slave device implemented this. But I don't have HW that supports that either so it wouldn't help *me* anyway... Anyway, ack from me for both patches. But maybe I'm the one picking them up? Wolfram? Cheers, Peter > - Should there also be I2C_DEVICE_PART_ID_ANY to enable maching > against all parts from a given manufacturer ? > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/i2c.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > index 16a3b73375a6..4e4372b064f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > @@ -2009,6 +2009,40 @@ int i2c_get_device_id(const struct i2c_client *client, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_get_device_id); > > +/** > + * i2c_verify_device_id - verify device ID > + * @client: The device to query > + * @id: Expected device ID > + * > + * Returns negative errno on error, zero on success. > + */ > +int i2c_verify_device_id(const struct i2c_client *client, > + const struct i2c_device_identity *id) > +{ > + struct i2c_device_identity real_id; > + int ret; > + > + if (id->manufacturer_id == I2C_DEVICE_ID_NONE) > + return 0; > + > + ret = i2c_get_device_id(client, &real_id); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (id->manufacturer_id != real_id.manufacturer_id || > + id->part_id != real_id.part_id || > + (id->die_revision != I2C_DEVICE_DIE_REVISION_ANY && > + id->die_revision != real_id.die_revision)) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "unexpected device id %03x-%03x-%x\n", > + real_id.manufacturer_id, real_id.part_id, > + real_id.die_revision); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_verify_device_id); > + > /* ---------------------------------------------------- > * the i2c address scanning function > * Will not work for 10-bit addresses! > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h > index 44ad14e016b5..45bae9717ecb 100644 > --- a/include/linux/i2c.h > +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h > @@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data_or_emulated(const struct i2c_client *client, > u8 command, u8 length, u8 *values); > int i2c_get_device_id(const struct i2c_client *client, > struct i2c_device_identity *id); > +int i2c_verify_device_id(const struct i2c_client *client, > + const struct i2c_device_identity *id); > #endif /* I2C */ > > /** > @@ -216,6 +218,7 @@ struct i2c_device_identity { > #define I2C_DEVICE_ID_NONE 0xffff > u16 part_id; > u8 die_revision; > +#define I2C_DEVICE_DIE_REVISION_ANY 0xff > }; > > enum i2c_alert_protocol { >