Quoting Karthik Ramasubramanian (2018-03-07 22:06:29) > > > On 3/6/2018 2:45 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Karthik Ramasubramanian (2018-03-05 16:51:23) > >> On 3/2/2018 3:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Ok. I've seen similar designs in some mmc drivers. For example, you can > > look at drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c and see that they register a > > clk_ops and then just start using that clk directly from the driver. > > There are also some helper functions for dividers that would hopefully > > make the job of calculating the best divider easier. > Thanks for the pointers. I will take a look at it. In the meanwhile I > had discussions with our clock team. They pointed out that the register > to write the divider value here is outside the scope of clock controller > which makes it trickier to implement your suggestion. They are already > in the mailing list and we will discuss further and get back to you in > this regard. Ok. Let me know if I can help answer any questions. > >>> > >>> Why are these noirq variants? Please add a comment. > >> The intention is to enable the console UART port usage as late as > >> possible in the suspend cycle. Hence noirq variants. I will add this as > >> a comment. Please let me know if the usage does not match the intention. > > > > Hm.. Does no_console_suspend not work? Or not work well enough? > It works. When console suspend is disabled, the suspend operation does > not get triggered and the resume operation checks if the console suspend > is disabled and performs the needed thing. Ok so then do we need the noirq variants? Or console suspend is special enough for this to not matter?
