Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: xlp9xx: Add support for SMBAlert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 03/06/2018 02:48 PM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 6/03/2018 16:36, Jan Glauber wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:26:20PM +0000, George Cherian wrote:
Add support for SMBus alert mechanism to i2c-xlp9xx driver.
The second interrupt is parsed to use for SMBus alert.
The first interrupt is the i2c controller main interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c
index eb8913e..9462eab 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xlp9xx.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  #include <linux/clk.h>
  #include <linux/completion.h>
  #include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/i2c-smbus.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
  #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -84,6 +85,8 @@ struct xlp9xx_i2c_dev {
      struct device *dev;
      struct i2c_adapter adapter;
      struct completion msg_complete;
+    struct i2c_smbus_alert_setup alert_data;
+    struct i2c_client *ara;
      int irq;
      bool msg_read;
      bool len_recv;
@@ -447,6 +450,21 @@ static int xlp9xx_i2c_get_frequency(struct platform_device *pdev,
      return 0;
  }
+static int xlp9xx_i2c_smbus_setup(struct xlp9xx_i2c_dev *priv,
+                  struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+    if (!priv->alert_data.irq)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    priv->alert_data.alert_edge_triggered = 0;

Hi George,

I think this is not needed anymore, see:
9b9f2b8bc2ac i2c: i2c-smbus: Use threaded irq for smbalert

--Jan

Yes.

And also all of this is not needed if named interrupts.
- interrupt-names
     "irq", "wakeup" and "smbus_alert" names are recognized by I2C core,
     other names are    left to individual drivers.

presence of named irq smbus_alert should result in alert handler being
created for that bus by the core


Thanks for the comments I will send out a v2 for this patch.

+
+    priv->ara = i2c_setup_smbus_alert(&priv->adapter, &priv->alert_data);
+    if (!priv->ara)
+        return -ENODEV;
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
  static int xlp9xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
      struct xlp9xx_i2c_dev *priv;
@@ -467,6 +485,10 @@ static int xlp9xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
          dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid irq!\n");
          return priv->irq;
      }
+    /* SMBAlert irq */
+    priv->alert_data.irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
+    if (priv->alert_data.irq <= 0)
+        priv->alert_data.irq = 0;
      xlp9xx_i2c_get_frequency(pdev, priv);
      xlp9xx_i2c_init(priv);
@@ -493,6 +515,10 @@ static int xlp9xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
      if (err)
          return err;
+    err = xlp9xx_i2c_smbus_setup(priv, pdev);
+    if (err)
+        dev_info(&pdev->dev, "No active SMBus alert %d\n", err);
+
      platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
      dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "I2C bus:%d added\n", priv->adapter.nr);
--
2.1.4







[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux