2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>: > The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable > so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > index abfae1beca2b..edf9247613f6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Required properties: > Some vendors use different model names for chips which are just > variants of the above. Known such exceptions are listed below: > > + "nxp,se97b" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02", > "renesas,r1ex24002" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02" > > - reg: The I2C address of the EEPROM. > -- > 2.11.0 > Applied to for-next, thanks. Bart
