> > + i2ctransfer: new tool to send user-defined I2C messages in one transfer > > Good idea. A leading capital would be appreciated for consistency. Ack. Shall I resend or could you fix locally? > Speaking of i2ctransfer, would you agree to remove it from the > i2c-tools-3.1 branch? As I recall, the only reason why it was added Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
