On 2017-12-18 17:18, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Tomasz Bachorski <tomasz.bachorski@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> It's possible that i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt() could return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> In that case, driver will request a probe deferral and an error
> suggesting device tree parsing problem will be reported. This is
> a pretty confusing information. Let's change the error handling,
> so driver will be able to request probe deferral without logging
> not related errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Bachorski <tomasz.bachorski@xxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied to i2c-mux/for-next, thanks!
Cheers,
Peter
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
> index f6c9c3dc6cad..c948e5a4cb04 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,9 @@ static int i2c_mux_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sizeof(mux->data));
> } else {
> ret = i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(mux, pdev);
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error parsing device tree");
> return ret;
>
