On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "<manufacturer>,<model>" pair is accepted as > long as a correct fallback is used for non-atmel chips. > - "atmel,24c00", "atmel,24c01", "atmel,24c02", "atmel,24c04", > - "atmel,24c08", "atmel,24c16", "atmel,24c32", "atmel,24c64", > - "atmel,24c128", "atmel,24c256", "atmel,24c512", "atmel,24c1024" > + "atmel,24c00", > + "atmel,24c01", > + "atmel,24c02", > + "atmel,spd", > + "atmel,24c04", Just to whom it may concern, I still don't like the ordering. By name is better to read and catch up the (un)supported chips. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
