Thank you, it fixes the issue on the multi-address eeprom that I have access to.
Tested-by: Sven Van Asbroeck on a 24AA16/24LC16B <svendev@xxxxxxxx>
One very minor remark:
+ struct device *dev = &at24->client[0]->dev;
It is sufficiently clear to others (and us a few months down the line)
why we are
using only client[0] for power management? Could it benefit from a separate
function with comments?
struct device *dev = get_pm_device(at24);
static struct device *get_pm_device(struct at24_data *at24)
{
/* explain why we use client[0] and not any of the dummies */
return &at24->client[0]->dev;
}
