Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] i2c: designware: add i2c gpio recovery option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/2017 17:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 09:29 +0100, Tim Sander wrote:

How do we switch pinctrl back to the native function? Is it
guaranteed
by pinctrl framework and all underneath drivers?
That is a good question. I don't have an understanding of how the
pinctrl
framework works with respect to requesting gpios.
My device (Intel / Altera Cyclone V SOC) doesn't have a pinctrl for
the i2c
/ gpio mux as yet.

According to the documentation from Intel/Altera it is not allowed to
change
the pinmux while running.

The driver is used on many platforms and requesting GPIO function while
running _is_ a pinmux change. >
  My guess is that they are using a shift chain, so
the output values of all pins in the chain are not stable. I think
they have
been lazy and just used the io config for fpgas with an jtag
controller and
connected the shift chain for pinconfig to this controller. So
unfortunatly it
is not possible to switch single pins on the run without interfering
with
other pins.

...for this certain SoC.

It's all setup by the bootloader and they don't expect
you to change it. I'm using two separate GPIO's "wired" to the i2c
bus via
the SOC FPGA for the recovery. Tim was doing the same.

Yes, i think thats the only way. But it is annoying that the i2c
controllers
of 201x have no way to recover from such bus errors >:-(.

Yep, it's pity, and we need to cope somehow with it.

So, my understanding of the current case is that either this change goes in only for certain SoC(s), or waiting until there is a guarantee from pinctrl subsystem to return function to native back when recovery finished.

My personal vote is for latter.


I'm not sure my change set will affect anything..
Current drivers using the gpio functions are requesting the gpio using the old interface.
If releasing the gpio doesn't restore the original functionality than nothing changes with this series.

For the designware driver, the recovery code wont be called unless the gpio's are specified via the device tree.
So the pinmux config shouldn't get changed.

It'd be nice to have the code in mainline even if most soc's can't use it as yet.


--
Regards
Phil Reid




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux