On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its >> >> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during >> >> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason. >> >> >> >> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have >> >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime >> >> suspend during system suspend. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++- >> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > Is this patch independent? >> >> It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also >> depends on the PCI support for the flag. > > No problem. Which tree to you propose this goes through? linux-pm.git if that's not a problem as the patches it depends on will go through it too. That said I'll resend it when the core patches it depends on are ready. Thanks, Rafael
