On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:44:14PM +0200, Claudio Foellmi wrote: > Move the check for a stuck SCL before the check for a high SDA. > This prevent false positives in the specific case that SDA is fine > and SCL is stuck, which previously returned 0. > > Also check SDA again after the loop, if we can. > Together, these changes should lead to a lot more failed > recoveries being caught and returning error codes. > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Foellmi <claudio.foellmi@xxxxxxxx> Applied to for-next, thanks! Huh, I thought we already fixed the add-SDA-check-after-loop, but seems I was wrong :( I am not super happy with the now doubled SDA check, but refactoring the whole loop is a seperate change IMO which can be done later.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
