Re: I2C slave mode for i2c-at91 driver

[Juergen Fitschen <me@xxxxxx>]

Hi Uwe,

> <halfknowledge> Isn't the at91 i2c hardware broken or unreliable such
> that it's usually recommended to stick to i2c-gpio? If so maybe the 
> same
> applies to client mode and someone should better extend i2c-gpio to
> handle the slave API?

Can you describe what kind of unreliability you've observed? I had the 
master and slave mode running for some time and it seems to work quite 
well. No data losses. No undesired states.

Best regards,
  Juergen