> <halfknowledge> Isn't the at91 i2c hardware broken or unreliable such > that it's usually recommended to stick to i2c-gpio? If so maybe the same I thought later versions have been fixed? (half knowledge, too) > applies to client mode and someone should better extend i2c-gpio to > handle the slave API? I wouldn't like that much. It means polling the GPIOs to scan the I2C bus for the communication of the master. That is timing-critical and does not like latency. Might even depend on the RT patchset ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
