Hi,
> + {
> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
> + },
checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
already.
Thanks,
Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
