On 2017-09-21 14:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Yes, this is trivial, both the patch and my complaint, but can you please add a "body of explanation" as suggested by submitting-patches in its topic "The canonical patch format"? Maintainers accepting empty patch descriptions are publicly shamed, and I do not wish to be in that boat, sorry... Cheers, Peter > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt > index 212e6779dc5c0caf..b38f58a1c8784184 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt > @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ multiplexer/switch will have one child node for each child bus. > > Optional properties: > - #address-cells = <1>; > - This property is required is the i2c-mux child node does not exist. > + This property is required if the i2c-mux child node does not exist. > > - #size-cells = <0>; > - This property is required is the i2c-mux child node does not exist. > + This property is required if the i2c-mux child node does not exist. > > - i2c-mux > For i2c multiplexers/switches that have child nodes that are a mixture >
