On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:41:33 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > >> > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > > Ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/19/649 >> > > > >> > > > The intel-lpss hosts the designware i2c controller device, which >> > > > needs to be up and running until all its i2c child devices have >> > > > suspended (child devices need to be accessible over i2c until >> > > > suspend_late() has been called for all those devices). >> > > > >> > > > So lets delay the resetting of the controller until suspend_late(). >> > > > I thought of renaming function to say *_late / *_early but that >> > > > might cause confusion since the same function is also used for runtime >> > > > suspend/resume. >> > > > >> > > > Fixes: 0b471aaa0e1a ("Put I2C and SPI controllers into reset state on suspend") >> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > --- >> > > > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h | 7 +------ >> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h >> > > > index 694116630ffa..865bbeaaf00c 100644 >> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h >> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h >> > > > @@ -38,12 +38,7 @@ int intel_lpss_resume(struct device *dev); >> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> > > > #define INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS \ >> > > > .prepare = intel_lpss_prepare, \ >> > > > - .suspend = intel_lpss_suspend, \ >> > > > - .resume = intel_lpss_resume, \ >> > > > - .freeze = intel_lpss_suspend, \ >> > > > - .thaw = intel_lpss_resume, \ >> > > > - .poweroff = intel_lpss_suspend, \ >> > > > - .restore = intel_lpss_resume, >> > > > + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_lpss_suspend, intel_lpss_resume) >> > > > #else >> > > > #define INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS >> > > > #endif >> > > >> > > So I sent this exact patch several days ago: >> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9939809/ >> > >> > You did? >> >> Yes, I did. >> >> > Any reason you didn't send it to me? >> >> Well, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> is very much in the CC list of it. >> >> Was I expected to use a different e-mail address for that? > > I don't monitor that one. Better to use the one in MAINTAINERS. OK, I will in the future.
