On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/19/649 >> >> The bus controllers should suspend the bus operations only after >> all of the devices on the bus have suspended their device >> completely. Since the i2c_client drivers could be talking to >> their devices in their suspend_late() calls, lets ensure that the >> bus is alive by that time. Thus moving the controller suspend logic to >> suspend_late(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c >> index 0e65b97842b4..66dd7f844c40 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c >> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev) >> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = { >> .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare, >> .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete, >> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume) >> + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume) >> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend, >> dw_i2c_plat_resume, >> NULL) > > No, you can't just do that. > > I sent patches to do it properly before my trip to LA last week, it > shouldn't be overly difficult to find them in the mailing list > archives. I can look them up tomorrow if need be. Thanks, I am guessing you mean this? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9939807/ > > Thanks, > Rafael
