> I'd argue that Brendan's patch should go in for-current as well, > because it fixes a divisor rounding error for the ast2500 (bus is > clocked faster than requested). Hmmm, pity, the description said "potential" issue so I decided for for-next. However, I wouldn't like to reshuffle my branches much so short before the merge window. So, would it be OK with you that you send both patches to stable after rc1?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
