On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:16:59AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The structure cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver is local to the source
> and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> symbol 'cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CCing Hans to ask him if he maybe wants to create a MAINTAINERS entry
for this driver, so he'll get CCed for such patches? :)
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
> index fe5caf70c7fe..01c94c918d4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static struct platform_device_id cht_wc_i2c_adap_id_table[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cht_wc_i2c_adap_id_table);
>
> -struct platform_driver cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver = {
> +static struct platform_driver cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver = {
> .probe = cht_wc_i2c_adap_i2c_probe,
> .remove = cht_wc_i2c_adap_i2c_remove,
> .driver = {
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
