On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:17:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Although unlikely without locking the smbux_xfer function may miss > the nack flag and further fixes in this patch-set add some more > complex constructions which need protection. Could be reworded, but after reading it 3 times, I got it. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied to for-next, thanks! Please don't forget the "i2c: " prefix in the subject.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
