> What kind of change are you looking for? The example was introduced by commit
> 04606ccc84e3 ("i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions") that says:
>
> - A example was added to designware-core.txt Documentation that shows
> how the slave can be setup using DTS
My fault, I missed it :(
> So I could change this example to instead use a real EEPROM compatible (e.g:
> "microchip,24c02") instead of "linux,slave-24c02". Would that be correct?
I think this is Luis call how he'd like this to be changed. Given the
current discussion, I'd think it must be dropped entirely.
Luis?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
