Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Make comment about I2C table requirement to reflect the code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:21:28AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> I2C drivers were required to have an I2C device ID table even if were for
> devices that would only be registered using a specific firmware interface
> (e.g: OF or ACPI).
> 
> But commit da10c06a044b ("i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed
> devices") changed the I2C core to relax the requirement and allow drivers
> to avoid defining this table.
> 
> Unfortunately it only took into account drivers for OF-only devices and
> forgot about ACPI-only ones, and this was fixed by commit c64ffff7a9d1
> ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case as well").
> 
> But the latter didn't update the original comment, so it doesn't reflect
> what the code does now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-current, thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux