On 08/02/2017 01:27 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
No platform (at least no upstreamed platform) has ever used this
platform_data. Just drop it and simplify the code.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pinctrl.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pinctrl.c
static int i2c_mux_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
(eliding some - lines for brevity in the following):
+ for (i = 0; i < num_names; i++) {
+ ret = of_property_read_string_index(np, "pinctrl-names", i,
+ &name);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Cannot parse pinctrl-names: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_put_parent;
+ }
+
+ mux->states[i] = pinctrl_lookup_state(mux->pinctrl, name);
if (IS_ERR(mux->states[i])) {
ret = PTR_ERR(mux->states[i]);
+ dev_err(dev, "Cannot look up pinctrl state %s: %d\n",
+ name, ret);
+ goto err_put_parent;
This error path doesn't undo pinctrl_lookup_state. Is that OK? I think
so, but wanted to check.
+ muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(parent, dev, num_names,
+ sizeof(*mux) + num_names * sizeof(*mux->states),
+ 0, i2c_mux_pinctrl_select, NULL);
...
+ /* Do not add any adapter for the idle state (if it's there at all). */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_names - !!mux->state_idle; i++) {
+ ret = i2c_mux_add_adapter(muxc, 0, i, 0);
Is it OK to potentially add one fewer adapter here than the child bus
count passed to i2c_mux_alloc() earlier? The old code specifically
excluded the idle state (if present) from the child bus count passed to
i2c_mux_alloc(), which was aided by the fact that it parsed the DT
before calling i2c_mux_alloc().
If those two things are OK, then:
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
