Hello Wolfram, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This series is a follow-up to patch [0] that added an OF device ID table > to the at24 EEPROM driver. As you suggested [1], this version instead of > adding entries for every used <vendor,device> tuple, only adds a single > entry for each chip type using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback. > > The first patch documents in the DT binding what's the correct vendor to > use and what are the ones that are being deprecated. The second one adds > the OF device ID table for the at24 driver and the next patches use this > vendor in the compatible string to each DTS that defines a compatible I2C > EEPROM device node. > > Patches can be applied independently since the DTS changes without driver > changes are no-op and the OF table won't be used without the DTS changes. > > [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/14/589 > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/15/99 > Are you planning to pick this series? It has been in the list for months and were resent many times... Best regards, Javier
