On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote: > >>>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>>>> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+) > >>>> [...] > >>>>> > >>>>> Dear Matthias, > >>>>> > >>>>> Could you take this patch together with > >>>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss > >>>> something? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Matthias > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2 > >>>> [2] > >>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1 > >>> > >>> Dear Matthias, > >>> > >>> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]? > >>> > >>> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701 > >>> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577 > >>> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589 > >>> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623 > >>> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173 > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >> > >> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding > >> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > > > > Dear Matthias, > > > > I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK? > > > > Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what > is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make > things clearer. > > Regards, > Matthias Dear Matthias, like this: diff: Required properties: - compatible: value should be either of the following. - (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c. - (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c. - (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c. - (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c. - (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c. + "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701 + "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577 + "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589 + "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623 + "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173 - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length of memory mapped region. - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
