Hi Jacopo,
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, jmondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:31:21AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Jacopo Mondi
>> <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I2c-mux channels are created with the mux parent device as their own
>> > parent, while they should be siblings of the mux itself.
>>
>> Isn't it the other way around? Cfr. the example and the patch.
>
> Yeah, I actually didn't know the exact meaning of "siblings" then.
>
> So:
> I2c-mux channels are created as mux siblings while they should be
> children of the mux itself. Fix it.
>
> Any better? ;)
Perfect!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
