Hi Guenter, > > Note that some files don't seem to have upstream > > users in board code, so they maybe could even be removed? I didn't check for > > While I understand where you are coming from, I am not typically that aggressive. > Such removals force vendors who are not really forthcoming with upstreaming to > deviate even further from upstream. It makes them even less likely to submit their > code upstream, and it may result in enforcing their belief that upstream doesn't > really care about vendors struggling to release boards and systems to their > customers. I clearly see your point. I meant more the case where platform_data became cruft because platforms moved to DT. I agree this is not so much the case for HWMON but it was true for the I2C master driver where I could remove the platform data and could save the include file and some code. That was just a nice cleanup. > >I prefer the series to go upstream via the subsystem tree; if you prefer that I > >take it via I2C, just let me know. > > > Series applied to hwmon-next. Super, thanks! Regards, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
