Em Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:27:48 +0200 Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message > >> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One > >> or two of those users actually add more information than already > >> provided by the central failure message. > >> > >> So, first fix the central error reporting to provide as much > >> information as any current user, and then remove the surplus > >> error reporting at the call sites. > > > > Yes, I like. > > > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! > > BTW, the improved error reporting in patch 1/9 is not needed for > patches 8/9 and 9/9 to make sense, the existing central error > message is already good enough. So, iio and media maintainers, > feel free to just grab those two patches. Or, they can go via > Wolfram and the i2c tree with the rest of the series. Either way > is fine with me, just let me know. Feel free to submit via I2C tree, together with the patch series: Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cheers, > peda Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html