On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 11:21 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-03-23 13:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 12:21 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > > > So, I'm still seeking guidance on how to handle these two patches. > > > > I have no strong opinion, but IDs might collide in the future if > > PCAxxxx > > will be assigned to something else and the patch will go stable@ > > (yeah, > > OTOH it's quite unlikely). > > > > So, we may postpone any stable@ back porting up to some real issue > > appears. Regarding second one, it's not important at all (could be > > even > > dropped). Consider it as example how to use _DSD and PRP0001 in ACPI > > case for DT-enabled drivers. > > Ok, I have added 1/2 to my i2c-mux for-current branch and will drop > 2/2 unless someone pipes up. Fair enough. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
