On 2017-03-23 10:00, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> The spec for the pca9546 was missing. This chip is the same as the pca9545
> except that it lacks interrupt lines. While the i2c_device_id table mapped
> the pca9546 to the pca9545 definition the compatible table did not.
Ouch, good catch, I have committed this to my i2c-mux for-current branch.
Cheers,
peda
> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> index dfc1c0e..69c2f5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ struct pca954x {
> .has_irq = 1,
> .muxtype = pca954x_isswi,
> },
> + [pca_9546] = {
> + .nchans = 4,
> + .muxtype = pca954x_isswi,
> + },
> [pca_9547] = {
> .nchans = 8,
> .enable = 0x8,
> @@ -134,7 +138,7 @@ struct pca954x {
> { "pca9543", pca_9543 },
> { "pca9544", pca_9544 },
> { "pca9545", pca_9545 },
> - { "pca9546", pca_9545 },
> + { "pca9546", pca_9546 },
> { "pca9547", pca_9547 },
> { "pca9548", pca_9548 },
> { }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
