On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 01:20 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have not got any comment, but does this seem
> a right thing to do?
> This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
> typedef'ed, or the bit position of I2C_M_RD.
<shrug>
I think bool can be guaranteed to be _Bool.
So a change not necessary as the original code
has a c90 guarantee of the same result.
6.3.1.2 Boolean type
1
When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value compares equal
to 0; otherwise, the result is 1.
> 2016-10-19 13:38 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c
[]
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int uniphier_fi2c_master_xfer_one(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > struct i2c_msg *msg, bool stop)
> > {
> > struct uniphier_fi2c_priv *priv = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> > - bool is_read = msg->flags & I2C_M_RD;
> > + bool is_read = !!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD);
> > unsigned long time_left;
> >
> > dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "%s: addr=0x%02x, len=%d, stop=%d\n",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
