Hi.
I have not got any comment, but does this seem
a right thing to do?
2016-10-19 13:38 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> This code is working, but it should not depend on how "bool" is
> typedef'ed, or the bit position of I2C_M_RD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c
> index db9105e..b54448e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier-f.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int uniphier_fi2c_master_xfer_one(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> struct i2c_msg *msg, bool stop)
> {
> struct uniphier_fi2c_priv *priv = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> - bool is_read = msg->flags & I2C_M_RD;
> + bool is_read = !!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD);
> unsigned long time_left;
>
> dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "%s: addr=0x%02x, len=%d, stop=%d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c
> index 56e92af..cc80bb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-uniphier.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int uniphier_i2c_stop(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> static int uniphier_i2c_master_xfer_one(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> struct i2c_msg *msg, bool stop)
> {
> - bool is_read = msg->flags & I2C_M_RD;
> + bool is_read = !!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD);
> bool recovery = false;
> int ret;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
