Re: [PATCH 5/5] mfd: axp20x: Fix axp288 volatile ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 14-12-16 15:41, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The axp288 pmic has a lot more volatile registers then we were
listing in axp288_volatile_ranges, fix this.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
index a294121..b9c1adf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
@@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ static const struct regmap_range axp288_writeable_ranges[] = {
 };

 static const struct regmap_range axp288_volatile_ranges[] = {
+       regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_PWR_INPUT_STATUS, AXP20X_PWR_OP_MODE),

Actually register 0x02 is volatile as well. Various fields say "write
1 to clear".
You might need a new define for it though, as the usage is different.

        regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_IRQ1_EN, AXP20X_IPSOUT_V_HIGH_L),
+       regmap_reg_range(AXP22X_GPIO_STATE, AXP22X_GPIO_STATE),
+       regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_FG_RES, AXP288_FG_CC_CAP_REG),

Could you also add AXP20X_TIMER_CTRL and 0xa0 ~ 0xa1 (real time
battery voltage),
if you're adding defines?

Hmm, ok, I'll do 2 new patches then 1 adding the defines and a v2
of this one. Lee, can you pick up 1 - 4 as they currently are
please? Then I'll just send these 2 new patches.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux