On 2016-11-24 16:14, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> + int values[mux->data.n_gpios];
>
> Hmm, my code checkers complain about this line:
>
> CHECK drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> SPARSE
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c:29:29: warning: Variable length array is used.
> SMATCH
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c:29:29: warning: Variable length array is used.
>
> Worth to fix it?
Yes, especially since I spotted an unrelated bug in my patch.
Regarding this though, I just thought (smallish) variable length
arrays were ok. But I guess smallish isn't very exact...
> BTW (unrelated to your patch), the compiler complains about:
>
> In file included from drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c:18:0:
> drivers/i2c/muxes/../../gpio/gpiolib.h:88:27: warning: ‘gpio_suffixes’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> static const char * const gpio_suffixes[] = { "gpios", "gpio" };
>
> which pointed out this line to me:
>
> 18 #include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h"
>
> which is probably worth fixing, too?
Yes, I never liked that include, but I don't know how to get
from struct gpio_desc * to the relevant struct device *
without it...
It's this line that needs it:
gpio_dev = &gpio_dec->gdev->dev;
If you can replace it with something neater, go for it!
Cheers,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
