On 2016-11-10 13:56, Vadim Pasternak wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Rosin [mailto:peda@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:13 PM >> To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver >> >> [resend to all, got the wrong button, sorry] >> >> On 2016-11-10 11:42, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2016-11-03 06:20, Vadim Pasternak wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I see that this patch has not been picked-up yet for i2c-next. >>>> Is it possible it was missed from some reason? >>> >>> Yes, apparently, really sorry about that! >>> >>> I'll put it in a branch and make a pull request for Wolfram (but that >>> is a bit new for me, we'll see how it goes). >> >> But now that I looked again, I noticed that the source is dual licensed and yet >> your MODULE_LICENSE tag says only "GPL v2". I.e. the same issue your i2c >> master driver had that Vladimir Zapolskiy noticed. >> >> Please fix this, and it might be a good idea to take a look in your other drivers as >> well in case you have further problems in this department... > > Hi Peter, > > Thank you for reply. > I'll re-submit it from the current i2c next branch. > Since I'll fix the license, I guess I should issue it as "patch v6". Right? Sounds right, yes. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
